R v Burkhard: The Dangers of Misidentifying Prior Consistent Statements by J Peterson
Prior consistent statements are presumptively inadmissible. There are a number of rationales served by this rule, including protection...
Evaluating the Constitutionality of the Customs Act and Admissibility of Electronic Evidence in R v Scott by N Ashford
Electronic devices contain a cache of information including an individual’s beliefs, relationships, and lifestyle. As technology...
Spousal Privilege in the Digital Era: Where Privacy Ends and Evidence Begins by V Rajput
In the intricate world of legal proceedings, the concept of privilege plays a crucial role in determining what evidence can be presented...
‘Sexts’ as Evidence of Future Likelihood to Consent: Implications of R v Reimer by C Bellows
Sexual assault cases present uniquely challenging evidentiary issues due to the threat of prejudicial reasoning against the complainant....
POSITIONS ON GLADUEÂ THAT CHALLENGE CONVENTIONAL IDEOLOGICAL DIVIDES
Enatt Daudi (law student) see previous posts: https://www.robsoncrim.com/single-post/positions-on-gladue-that-challenge-conventional-ideo...
