What is Just? - Jordan DeMerchant One of the most fundamental questions to the functioning of justice is what is a just punishment for a crime? The Manitoba Court of Appea...
R v Javanmardi - Caitlin Hentig Facts: The accused, Javanmardi, has a naturopathic clinic in Quebec and Roger Matern was a new patient. Matern was 84 years old and had h...
R v. Poulin - P. Gutowski Revising Canadian Courts’ Interpretation of Sentencing Rights A majority of the Supreme Court of Canada issued a decision on s. 11(i) of ...
A case comment on Fleming v Ontario - Nikolai Bola This case is brought to the court on appeal from the trial judge’s finding in favour of the plaintiff, who found a breach of s 2 (b), 7 a...
R v Javanmardi - Justine Mayan This case is interesting for two reasons. Firstly, the contrast between the majority and the minority definitions of a dangerous act revo...
