‘Sexts’ as Evidence of Future Likelihood to Consent: Implications of R v Reimer by C Bellows
Sexual assault cases present uniquely challenging evidentiary issues due to the threat of prejudicial reasoning against the complainant....
R. v. Diakite: Section 276 and its Limitations on Crown Evidence
Anna Nymus Evidence presented in criminal trials is an essential element of the decision-making process of judges and juries. There is...
R v J.J – The Admissibility of a Victim’s Entire Life
The admission of evidence in a trial dealing with sexual offences is always a sensitive topic.
The Evolution of Capacity and Consent - Brittney Macht
Capacity and consent have historically been considered to be distinct concepts, yet in modern day consideration of sexual assault cases,...
Should We Move Away From Such a Stringent Standard of Proof in Cases of Sexual Assault?
Author: Samantha Onchulenko Concern has been raised about the standard of proof applicable in serious cases of sexual assault and whether...
