Protective Detention or Constitutional Problem? Bill 48 and the Section 7 Case Against Manitoba's 72-Hour Detox Law
n November 2025, Manitoba became the first province in Canada to authorize 72 hours of involuntary detention for intoxicated individuals, tripling the previous limit with near-unanimous legislative support. Bill 48, The Protective Detention and Care of Intoxicated Persons Act, passed through the legislature quickly, but the constitutional questions it raises will not resolve as easily.
Mind Control in the Digital Age (Mind Shaping and Cognitive Liberty) - a Podcast
Episode: Mind Control in the Digital Age (Mind Shaping and Cognitive Liberty)
Speakers: Jayden; Andreas
0:00
Jayden: Hello everyone. I’m Jayden, and with me is my colleague and friend Andreas. Welcome back to our podcast. Today we’re diving into something that sounds like science fiction, but is happening right now: mind control in the digital age.
Now, when we say “mind control,” we’re not talking about tinfoil hats or conspiracy theories. We’re talking about real technologi
The “Perfect” Victim: The Reliance on Demeanour Evidence in Child Sexual Abuse Cases
Several factors must be considered when assessing the credibility of a witness or victim during a trial, one of which is their demeanour. Demeanour evidence is behavioural observations made by either the trier of fact or jury during witness testimony. Triers of fact analyze a witness’s demeanour for sincerity and honesty in determining credibility.
Similar Fact Evidence and the Defence of Consent: A Principled Application of R v. Handy in R v. Cyrus
The admissibility of similar fact evidence presents a persistent challenge in Canadian
evidence law, particularly in sexual assault prosecutions where credibility assessments are often
central. Evidence of an accused’s other discreditable conduct is presumptively inadmissible due to
the risk of propensity reasoning and the resulting moral and reasoning prejudice.
Where Law Meets Limitations: The Roles and Boundaries of Trial Judges in the Development of the Common Law
There is no question that historically, women and men have been hesitant to come forward and report sexual offences. These victims are afraid to come forward because of the fear of not being believed, fear of retribution, and fear of the criminal justice system and its methods. However, in the past few decades, the combined efforts of Parliament and the common law have helped to bridge some of the gaps that perpetuate these fears.
