R v Burkhard: The Dangers of Misidentifying Prior Consistent Statements by J Peterson
Prior consistent statements are presumptively inadmissible. There are a number of rationales served by this rule, including protection...
Evaluating the Constitutionality of the Customs Act and Admissibility of Electronic Evidence in R v Scott by N Ashford
Electronic devices contain a cache of information including an individual’s beliefs, relationships, and lifestyle. As technology...
Spousal Privilege and the Admissibility of Evidence in the Digital Age by V Rajput
In the intricate world of legal proceedings, the concept of privilege plays a crucial role in determining what evidence can be presented...
‘Sexts’ as Evidence of Future Likelihood to Consent: Implications of R v Reimer by C Bellows
Sexual assault cases present uniquely challenging evidentiary issues due to the threat of prejudicial reasoning against the complainant....
Unshackling Bail Reform: The Misguided Nature of Bill C-48 by M Yuel
In early 2023, an Ontario police officer lost their life at the hands of an individual who had been granted judicial release, otherwise...
