‘Sexts’ as Evidence of Future Likelihood to Consent: Implications of R v Reimer
Author: CB Sexual assault cases present uniquely challenging evidentiary issues due to the threat of prejudicial reasoning against the...
Applying Gladue Principles to Corbett Applications in R v King: A New Safeguard for Indigenous Accused Persons?
Author: BC Introduction In R v Hart , Cromwell JA stated that the cross-examination process is a “cornerstone of the adversarial...
When Privacy Prevails Over the Admission of Evidence
Author: DT In the realm of evidence, one issue that has arisen is whether private records can be admissible in sexual assault...
The Criminal Record of the Accused and the Mind of the Reasonable Juror
Author: JH Having a criminal record is inherently prejudicial to any Canadian. A criminal record impacts a person’s ability...
No More Missed Chances: It is Time for the SCC to Clarify Prior Sexual Activity Evidence
Authors- EM et al Introduction In every sexual offence trial, the Court must balance two competing principles: protecting the...
